There are actually a lot of great ultra wide angle lenses for the Fuji X Series now. Here are my thoughts on it. In terms of overall build quality, the XF 14mm f2. This is a solid lens that shows no signs of inferior workmanship like any loose fittings, creaks or rattles.

The weight and size of the XF 14mm combine to make a lens that feels perfectly balanced on my X-T2. I own the Zeiss Touit 12mm f2. I also love the 18mm equivalent focal length but I can definitely appreciate the size of the XF 14mm.

In some ways, I think I actually find it better balanced than my XF 35mm f1. What I also appreciate is the size of the included lens hood. If you ask me, Fuji did a good job here. As for other parts of the XF 14mm f2. The focus ring is pretty cool too.

XF 14mm F2.8 Review

If you want to focus manually, you simply pull the focus ring back towards the rear element. A distant scale is then revealed, which you can use with the depth of field scale. The focus ring is nice and smooth as well. If you want to go back to autofocus, simply pull the focus ring towards the front element.

This also prevents the focus ring from rotating. There are other Fuji lenses that have this switch to manual focus feature, and I personally like it a lot. Not once did I accidentally move the focus ring into manual or autofocus.

Overall, it does so in a nice, smooth way but it feels a little loose to me. Because of this, I accidentally changed my settings a couple of times. I much prefer what I see on lenses like the XF 35mm f2, for example. In terms of the autofocus, there is really nothing to complain about.

I definitely did not feel hindered by the autofocus in any way.A few years ago I was toying with the idea of a digital Leica M with a three lens setup. It would be built around a 50mm, 35mm, and 21mm combo. It did not take much research to realize that this setup was cost prohibitive for me.

The full-frame equivalent focal length is 21mm. Currently, this is the widest lens in my setup of four prime lenses for the X-series. So why not chose a wider option? This was a personal choice as I was getting tired of the "too wide" look. I wanted something with a more natural look. Something with better correction and last but not least, lightweight and compact. I tried them side by side and could not see any difference in sharpness. It came down to the difference in focal length, weight, and price.

The 16mm is weather sealed, weighs in at grams, and is a couple of stops faster with it's max f-stop of 1. The 14mm is grams and more compact. Both feature the clutch mechanism to switch between AF and manual focusing.

Both have a hard stop for infinity focus, which can come in handy for night and landscape photography. The 14mm made more sense, giving me a nice gap in focal length from the 23mm to 14mm. The 16mm felt too close to the 23mm, added more weight and cost.

fuji 14mm

I have tried it a few times now and have nothing bad to say about it. The lens fits in a pocket if need be and has been with me, travelling to more than 30 countries. It fits perfectly with good balance on my favourite travel camera, the X-Pro2. For me, it has a perfect focal length for travel photography. Wide by not too wide. A couple of negatives. Using this for interior real estate photography I would suggest a slightly wider option, perhaps the XF mm or upcoming XF mm.

At times I found the 14mm was not wide enough for this purpose. It would be nice if the lens had been weather sealed. Below are a few of favourite captures from the past three years. We travel with Fujifilm X-Series cameras and lenses visiting 50 countries in 50 months. Please consider using our links if you are in the market for this lens. There is no additional cost and we will receive a commission. How wide is too wide? It fits perfectly with good balance on my favourite travel camera, the X-Pro2 It is sharp and well corrected Build quality is top notch For me, it has a perfect focal length for travel photography.

How you can help us! You may also like. Fujifilm X-T30 - Camera Review. Fujifilm X-T3 - Camera Review. Fujifilm XF - Camera Review.Initially when deciding on which wide angle lens I wanted to complete my Fuji Holy Trinity, I had 5 choices.

My choices were. After plenty of research on each lens, considering what lenses I already owned, also a huge review of all my previous wide angle shots taken with Canon, I decided that the XF 14mm was the one for me. Since writing about what I consider to be the Fuji Holy TrinityI have had numerous messages asking me why the 14mm and not the 16mm.

Or would I recommend one over the other, and which should you buy? The simple answer is, do you need wider than the equivalent of a full frame 24mm or not? Do you need the extra stops of light that the 16mm will provide?

Answering those will give you your decision. For me, when I was primarily on a Canon system, I found that when I was using my mm, and taking a wide shot, I always needed wider, but not much wider.

That was my main reason for choosing the 14mm over the 16mm. Right, now my thoughts on the lens, now I have quickly got my reasons down as to why the 14mm over the others mentioned. First thing to mention, which was no surprise, is that this lens is sharp.

This is something that I and many others love about Fujis glass. The 1 thing that still shocks me is the heft to Fujis lenses. This lens is so small yet as soon as you pick it up, you instantly feel the weight and quality in your hands.

It is solidly built and the focus ring snaps back and forth securely, with no play. I would prefer all Fuji lenses to have more solid clicks on their aperture rings, although this does not take away from how this lens performs.

Eso log bot

Focusing is very quick with the 14mm. Faster focusing than my XF 23mm in all lighting conditions, which did surprise me. I found manual focusing using the focus assists a little challenging, as once you are a few metres away from your subject, almost everything is in focus anyway, so sometimes I would slightly miss the mark with only a tiny adjustment needed to be made.

Manual focusing was more accurate for me when using the distance scales rather than the focus assists. Tracking focus with the X-T1 and firmware 4. With this lens being the equivalent of a 21mm field of view on a full framed sensor, I expected there to be quite a bit of flare when pointed straight at the sun, or when the sun is directly behind your subject.

This was not the case! When you remove the lens hood, and angle the lens intentionally to promote lens flare, it is still difficult to get this lens to flare. With the hood on, no problem at all.

Fujifilm XF 14mm f2.8 R Lens Review

As you can see from the shot below with the shadows, the sun was directly behind and very harsh, hitting the lens straight on with no problem what so ever. If the lens you currently use for landscapes has flare issues, then this is the lens may be the one for you.

When I first took the lens out to see how it performed, I wanted to see how it handled bokeh, and what the focus falloff was like. I wanted to see how the out of focus areas rendered, and to what extent. As you can see, the bokeh is rendered beautifully, and although it is a wide angle lens, it is still possible to get an out of focus background when close focusing. As far as I was concerned, it was a back up lens, for those just in case moments when I needed a wider lens.

This has now become my group shot lens. IF I know that I am about to be taking a group shot, then even before I get to where I need to be, I make sure the 14mm is attached. The XF 23mm was until now my go to lens for personal days out.While much of the commentary is out of date, the image comparisons still apply.

The extra size, heft, and price adds up to a lens that performs better overall, optically speaking. The price is the same for you, but a small percentage of the purchase price goes to me, which helps keep this site going. Thank you. I headed back to the store to try another sample, and the other one was significantly better. I would say my 14mm, 23mm, and 35mm all feel about the same. The knurled focus ring on the 14mm, on the other hand, is so fantastically grippy and sharp, it feels like it could cut your fingers if you squeeze too hard.

I love it. The dampening of the focus ring on all lenses has been excellent. I would happily take whatever increase in size this feature added to the 18mm, and 35mm for that matter. This batch of images illustrates the difference in field of view, and perspective. The framing of the monument was adjusted in the 3rd image to match the 18mm more closely. Click to enlarge and arrow through the gallery to get a good sense of the differences.

Either focal length can be ideal for landscape images. These images are shot in RAF format to give you the most accurate idea of sharpness possible.

fuji 14mm

They were imported into Lightroom with the exact same Sharpening applied. Some minor Treatment adjustments were also applied to compensate for exposing to the right and using up the histogram. Focus was on the two buildings in the centre of the frame. The horizons on both images appears to look ok. Even less can be easily gleaned from these crops, but of note are the trees on the horizon. The 14mm is holding much more detail right out to the edge whereas the 18mm starts to look a little soft.

And finally, on the right side, I lined up the building as closely as possible. Once again, the 14mm is holding detail better than the 18mm. Indeed it does. My test shot, however, is pretty terrible. For the time-being, they illustrate what most of us probably already knew, in the wide-angle prime bokeh battle, the 18mm takes the cake.

The creamier bokeh also suggests it could be useful for wide-angle portraiture. It also provides excellent handling, and super sharp images. It currently has its own spot in my Billingham. Fuji vs. This ad-free site is made possible by the support its readers. If you enjoy the content, you can help by using any of the links below.

Just use the links below for any of your online shopping to help me keep testing, reviewing, and comparing.

X-T2 vs. X-Pro2 X-T2 vs. X-T1 X-Pro2 vs. X-Pro1 X-T10 vs. X-T1 vs. X-E2 S X-T1 vs. X-E2 vs.This site is supported by the advertisements on it, please disable your AdBlocker so we can continue to provide you with the quality content you expect. Log in or Sign up. Fuji X Forum. Fujifilm XF 14mm F2. I am looking at getting a wide angle lens and both the Fujifilm XF 14mm F2. My main use is architectural photography with some landscape.

I am hoping that someone out there has had experience of both these lenses and can give a comparison review. I will be using it with a X-T2.

Janam praman patra online cg download

Thanks for any advice. AllsopJun 17, Forget about image quality differences, they are irrelevant. I find the 14mm already hard to use sometimes and would not want to go any wider with a prime. In that case I'd consider the instead so at least I have the option of using a narrower field of view. F2Bthere likes this. There are comparison reviews posted here if you search. I own both and use both. My use is strictly for landscape and outdoor work so not applicable to architectural photography.

The only meaningful comment that I could make would be that the 12mm might make your image size smaller than you would want it to be. That's a big difference. Heh guys that is valuable advice rom you all, thanks. I may take up the advice to have a look at the which from what you describe may be the better option. AllsopJun 18, I have the 14mm and find it to be an excellent lens. When I need wider which is rare I dig out my inexpensive Samyang 8mm fisheye.

What I found is that I rarely shot at the widest focal length but your needs may be quite different. The Fuji may indeed be your best choice. I think that I would have bought one instead of the 14mm if had been available at the time. NYRichJun 18, I don't particularly like the hood design of the Zeiss, but I have found a much smaller one to use on it.

Plots in vallam sriperumbudur

So a lot really depends on whether you are wanting corner to corner sharpness or can live with a little softness around the edges some reviews of the Zeiss 12mm make this same observation about corner softness, but I have not found that to be the case with my raw images when edited in either Lightroom or Photoshop.

AllsopJun 20, You must log in or sign up to reply here. Show Ignored Content. Share This Page Tweet. Your name or email address: Do you already have an account? No, create an account now.Initially when deciding on which wide angle lens I wanted to complete my Fuji Holy Trinity, I had 5 choices. My choices were. After plenty of research on each lens, considering what lenses I already owned, also a huge review of all my previous wide angle shots taken with Canon, I decided that the XF 14mm was the one for me.

Since writing about what I consider to be the Fuji Holy TrinityI have had numerous messages asking me why the 14mm and not the 16mm.

How to get free data bundles

Or would I recommend one over the other, and which should you buy? The simple answer is, do you need wider than the equivalent of a full frame 24mm or not? Do you need the extra stops of light that the 16mm will provide? Answering those will give you your decision. For me, when I was primarily on a Canon system, I found that when I was using my mm, and taking a wide shot, I always needed wider, but not much wider.

That was my main reason for choosing the 14mm over the 16mm. Right, now my thoughts on the lens, now I have quickly got my reasons down as to why the 14mm over the others mentioned.

First thing to mention, which was no surprise, is that this lens is sharp. This is something that I and many others love about Fujis glass. The 1 thing that still shocks me is the heft to Fujis lenses. This lens is so small yet as soon as you pick it up, you instantly feel the weight and quality in your hands.

It is solidly built and the focus ring snaps back and forth securely, with no play. I would prefer all Fuji lenses to have more solid clicks on their aperture rings, although this does not take away from how this lens performs. Focusing is very quick with the 14mm.

Faster focusing than my XF 23mm in all lighting conditions, which did surprise me. I found manual focusing using the focus assists a little challenging, as once you are a few metres away from your subject, almost everything is in focus anyway, so sometimes I would slightly miss the mark with only a tiny adjustment needed to be made.

Manual focusing was more accurate for me when using the distance scales rather than the focus assists. Tracking focus with the X-T1 and firmware 4. With this lens being the equivalent of a 21mm field of view on a full framed sensor, I expected there to be quite a bit of flare when pointed straight at the sun, or when the sun is directly behind your subject.

This was not the case! When you remove the lens hood, and angle the lens intentionally to promote lens flare, it is still difficult to get this lens to flare. With the hood on, no problem at all. As you can see from the shot below with the shadows, the sun was directly behind and very harsh, hitting the lens straight on with no problem what so ever.

Gonads meaning in english

If the lens you currently use for landscapes has flare issues, then this is the lens may be the one for you. When I first took the lens out to see how it performed, I wanted to see how it handled bokeh, and what the focus falloff was like. I wanted to see how the out of focus areas rendered, and to what extent.

As you can see, the bokeh is rendered beautifully, and although it is a wide angle lens, it is still possible to get an out of focus background when close focusing. As far as I was concerned, it was a back up lens, for those just in case moments when I needed a wider lens.There was enough of a variance in focal length to make choosing simple, or owning both perfectly viable.

fuji 14mm

This article will hopefully help you decide which wide angle primes are right for you, if any. This ad and tracker-free site is made possible by the support its readers. If you enjoy the content, you can help by using any of the links below. No loose aperture rings or audibly rough focusing rings here. The build is fantastic. A gentle breeze could have changed the aperture on that lens.

Wolfram alpha derivative calculator widget

This is more a testament to how good the 16 is, rather than a shot at the The one I have is good, but the focus ring on both the other lenses is better. My advice for any lens you buy is to shop from an online vendor with a liberal return policy, or check the rings in-store before you buy. Both these features makes zone focusing for street, or setting hyperfocal distances for landscapes much easier.

Where weighting is concerned, all these lenses balance brilliantly on the X-T1 or X-Pro1. I can easily shoot one-handed with any of these lenses mounted on any of the mentioned bodies. It does make me wonder how much the hood has been optimized for the Anyhow, I hope we see some more carefully crafted metal hoods from Fuji.

Fujifilm Fujinon XF 14mm 2.8 R Real Photographer LENS REVIEW

While their focal length demarcations are separated by a mere 2mm, the difference in field of view is quite remarkable.

First up, a series of images captured from the same location. Click to enlarge and use your arrow keys to quickly cycle through the images. See how much it elongates?

Fujifilm XF 14mm F2.8 R review

This section, along with Bokeh, are likely to be the most referred to. Because of this, I decided it was time to add another element to my testing. Testing sharpness at wide angles can be challenging because of their wide field of view. While the centre of the frame is perfectly in focus, the edges and corners could very well be outside of the depth of field afforded by wider aperture.

Sure, I could always capture a bunch of different images with my focus point in various parts of the frame, but that adds to my workload, which hinders my ability to get content online that hopefully helps you fine people can make your purchasing decisions.

Centre sharpness of the 16mm at these apertures is incredible. That bottom edge is looking pretty stellar too, but the extreme corners are still a little soft. Again, JPEG shooters have less to worry about. It does well in the centre of the frame but for anywhere else, the 18mm is outmatched but its wider siblings. Wide angles and shallow depth of field can be combined to create unique images. Two stops makes a huge difference.

Our second set of images takes the busy background to another level. This is most evident in the areas of ground between the ropes.

In terms of quality though, I have a tough time picking a winner out of the three. I simply prefer the incraesed blurring of the other two lenses. Talk about conflicting notions. It does manage to throw the background out of focus reasonably well though. Our final comparison on the bokeh front, will be ever-important balls of bokeh.


thoughts on “Fuji 14mm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *